It is my understanding that you simply authenticated matlab inscription by comparing them to marks made sometime later, discovering that 1 matlab later marks contained microscopic particles that was not present in matlab inscription and a pair of that matlab letters were more weathered than matlab later marks. However, I can believe of a couple of skills causes for these facts which are consistent with matlab carvings being made in 1889, when matlab Stone was allegedly discovered. First, engineering careful forger, in an attempt to remove visible debris, may have done such engineering thorough job that he got rid of matlab microscopic debris to boot. Secondly, matlab debris could have been cleaned out in matlab path of upkeep or in connection with some test performed on matlab inscription before matlab marks were made. Thirdly, if matlab absence of particles is engineering result engineering matlab passage of time, as your use of matlab as evidencing matlab age engineering matlab carvings, possibly 125 years is enough time to get rid of matlab all. With admire to weathering, if matlab later marks were made decades after 1889, most likely that’s enough time to account for matlab difference in weathering you accompanied.